DOVER, Pa. (AP) —Dover's much-maligned school policy of presenting "intelligent design'' as an alternative to evolution was officially relegated to the history books Tuesday night.
On a voice vote, and with no discussion beforehand, the newly elected Dover Area School Board unanimously rescinded the policy. Two weeks earlier, a judge ruled the policy unconstitutional.
"This is it,'' new school board president Bernadette Reinking said Tuesday, indicating the vote was final and the case was closed.
A different group of school board members had been in control when the policy was approved in October 2004. The policy required that a statement be read to Dover public school students about "intelligent design'' before ninth-grade biology class lessons on evolution.
The statement said Darwin's theory is "not a fact'' and has inexplicable "gaps.'' It also referred students to an "intelligent-design'' book, "Of Pandas and People.''
Eight families sued, and on Dec. 20, U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III sided with their argument that the concept of "intelligent design'' —which attributes the existence of complex organisms to an unidentified intelligent cause —is religious, not scientific. The judge said that violated the establishment clause in the First Amendment.
Dover biology teacher Jennifer Miller was relieved Tuesday night to know the policy was officially off the books.
"I will feel comfortable again teaching what I'd always felt comfortable teaching,'' she after the meeting, attended by a crowd of about 100 people.
School board members declined to comment after the vote.
Most of the previous board members who had defended the policy were ousted in the November election, replaced by candidates who pledged to eliminate the policy.
Policy defenders had said they were trying to improve science education by exposing students to alternatives with the policy. But the judge said the board's real purpose was "to promote religion in the public school classroom,'' and said intelligent design could not be taught as an alternative to evolution in biology classes.
"I tried ... to warn the board that we were facing a disaster and obviously I was not persuasive enough,'' said Jeff Brown, a former board member who resigned in protest after the policy passed. He said the costly court battle could have been avoided.
The Dover policy and high-profile lawsuit added fuel to a national debate over "intelligent design.''
In Kansas, where state officials have been arguing over the teaching of evolution since 1999, education officials recently approved science standards that treat evolution as a flawed theory.
In Georgia, the state schools superintendent drew protests in 2004 for proposing a science curriculum that replaced the word "evolution'' with "changes over time.'' Last year, a federal judge ordered Cobb County schools to remove from biology textbooks stickers that called evolution a theory, not a fact.
Related Coverage
- SPECIAL REPORT: Evolution & Intelligent Design
- Pope Weighs in on Evolution Controversy
- Vatican Cardinal: Listen to What Modern Science Has to Offer
- Behind the Controversy: How Evolution Works
- Top 10 Missing Links in Human Evolution
- Poll: Public Divided on Evolution
- Evolution's Vestigal Organs
- Top 10 Creation Myths
Dover Trial Coverage (Most recent stories at top)
- Judge Rules: Intelligent Design Can't Be Taught in Class
- Backer of 'Intelligent Design' Testifies
- School District Did Not Foresee 'Intelligent Design' Legal Problem
- Professor Testifies: Humans a Product of God, Not Evolution
- Lawyers Prepare to Defend 'Intelligent Design'
- School Board Members 'Did Not Believe in Evolution'
- Faith and Reason Compatible, Scientist Testifies
- Opening Arguments Made in 'Intelligent Design' Court Case
- Court Case Threatens to 'Drag Science into the Supernatural'
- District Loosens 'Intelligent Design' Rule
- ACLU Sues Pa. School District Over 'Intelligent Design' Curriculum
SPECIAL REPORT
Evolution & Intelligent Design
PART 1
An Ambiguous Assault on Evolution
This Trojan Horse for Creationism has become very popular. But who is being duped? And what does it all mean for morality?
PART 2
Intelligent design is presented as a legitimate scientific theory and an alternative to Darwinism, but a close look at the arguments shows they don't pass scientific muster. So why are scientists worried?
PART 3
As evolution takes a beating, scientists remind us of the difference between fact, theory and belief.
PART 4:
Anti-evolution Attacks on the Rise
Each time the effort to introduce creationism into classrooms starts up again, so does legislation aimed against evolution. Learn about the rash of recent cases, plus a look at historically pertinent court cases.
PLUS
